
-
CFA三级
包含CFA三级传统在线课程相关提问答疑;
专场人数:1524提问数量:40736
Asset Allocation 請問實際上考試這樣寫可以嗎? 2017 Q8 A AO 1. The foundation has no liability-like payments, but only minimum spending and an AO approach can minimize the likelihood of decline; ALM 1. There is a fixed amount of EUR 5mn to distribute yearly, which can bee seen as an obligation to pay. B 1. Assets in the same asset class should be homogenous. Private equity and real estate are not the same; 2. Asset classes should be mutually exclusive. Broad EUR fixed income is not different from EUR-denominated government bonds. C 1. Emerging market equities should be added into the current portfolio; 2. Sharpe ratio of new asset class > Sharpe ratio of current portfolio × correlation 0.481 > 0.538 × 0.79 => 0.481 > 0.425 D 1. Because the investment horizon of the foundation is a perpetuity, Monte Carlo is suitable for investment over a multi-period; 2. Monto Carlo can compute a path-dependent terminal value since the foundation is rebalanced every six months.
已回答R2书后题第27题, 关于软美元这个我想请教一下老师. 题目中说道经纪商会将这个新服务获得的一部分好处运用到老的服务上(更高端的服务). 我知道这个行为是符合准则要求的, 但是这个算不算是软美元呢? 因为选项A中说了即便是禁止软美元的账户也可以使用这个新服务.
已回答Asset Allocation 想請問在實際上考試這樣寫可以嗎? 2018 Q9 A. 1. Sazri should recommend portfolio B over portfolio A 2. The expected utility of portfolio B is (3.5%) higher than the expected utility of portfolio A (3.1%). B 1. Sarzi should recommend allocation 2 2. The amount of liability accounts for 80% of the plan. Allocation 2 has 80% of indexed-linked government bonds, which matches the nature of the liability. C 1. Goal 1 should choose module B YTM = 5.0%, PMT = 0, N = 10, FV = $7.5mn; PV = 4,604,349 2. Goal 2 should choose module C YTM = 6.9%, PMT = 0, N = 25, FV = $15mn; PV = 2,829,102 3. Calculating Weighs Module A: 25.7% [(10,000,000 - 4,604,349 - 2,829,102)/ 10,000,000] Module B: 46.0% (4,604,349/10,000,000) Module C: 28.3% (2,829,102/10,000,000)
已回答請問 reading 13 practice problem Q15 假設在實際上考試中,我應該寫下哪些點可以拿到分數呢? Q1. Compared with an MVO approach, weights of global market portfolio are input in a reverse optimization approach. Compared with an MVO approach, allocation of a reverse optimization approach will be more diversified. Q2. Return on Global Bonds = 2.0% + (0.6) (5.5%) = 5.3% Return on US Equities = 2.0% + (1.4) (5.5%) = 9.7% 如果這樣寫可以嗎?
已回答老师你好,有两个有关ethics的问题 1)在第一张图片中,A基金怎么做才不会违规?他怎么去审核才不违规? 2)有关重大信息:竞争对手的假设才被视为不是重大信息。那这个为什么视为不违规…… 谢谢
老师好,2013年个人IPS第一题(voorts)。题目题干最后一行,说有一个cash reserve。题目正解中没有考虑这个cash reserve,alternate answer里考虑cash reserve了。我想确认,是考虑好还是不考虑好。——老师,我又有一个新的问题,C小问答案里算了cash reserve,那是为什么A小问里的cash flow needs里没有算这部分呢?
已回答精品问答
- liability relatibe asset allocation这三种方式的区别是什么呀 怎么区分
- 第5题,从经济学公式X-M=(S-I)+(T-G)来看,如果经常账户赤字增加,不是意味着该国投资大于储蓄,或政府支出大于税收么,那么整体环境应该是好的,应该有利于资本的流入吧?为什么答案是反过来去赤字减少或盈余的国家呢?
- 这里第二题的意思是三种方法都适用吗?没太理解,能否在讲解下
- 到底该怎么判断一类和二类错误?做的题目解答标准不一致啊,我看到另一道题的版本是 - 一类错误是做了错的事,二类是没做对的事。现在这一题,对于不合格的经理不采取行动,不就是二类错误 - 没做对的事吗?
- 关于什么时候用IRR 、MOIC
- 1.这里右侧支付端这段,party A角度他有market value risk时谁有?上下部分矛盾了啊.2.左侧的图和配文是什么意思?原本是什么?又变成什么?3.注意里面:fixed端有
- Risk Budget and risk parity 第二道思考题,里面的Variance是不是完全是个冗余信息,给来误导的呀?
- 老师,给最新的信息更高权重为什么不是availability bias呢?










