
-
CFA三级
包含CFA三级传统在线课程相关提问答疑;
专场人数:1534提问数量:40926
Asset Allocation 請問實際上考試這樣寫可以嗎? 2017 Q8 A AO 1. The foundation has no liability-like payments, but only minimum spending and an AO approach can minimize the likelihood of decline; ALM 1. There is a fixed amount of EUR 5mn to distribute yearly, which can bee seen as an obligation to pay. B 1. Assets in the same asset class should be homogenous. Private equity and real estate are not the same; 2. Asset classes should be mutually exclusive. Broad EUR fixed income is not different from EUR-denominated government bonds. C 1. Emerging market equities should be added into the current portfolio; 2. Sharpe ratio of new asset class > Sharpe ratio of current portfolio × correlation 0.481 > 0.538 × 0.79 => 0.481 > 0.425 D 1. Because the investment horizon of the foundation is a perpetuity, Monte Carlo is suitable for investment over a multi-period; 2. Monto Carlo can compute a path-dependent terminal value since the foundation is rebalanced every six months.
已回答R2书后题第27题, 关于软美元这个我想请教一下老师. 题目中说道经纪商会将这个新服务获得的一部分好处运用到老的服务上(更高端的服务). 我知道这个行为是符合准则要求的, 但是这个算不算是软美元呢? 因为选项A中说了即便是禁止软美元的账户也可以使用这个新服务.
已回答Asset Allocation 想請問在實際上考試這樣寫可以嗎? 2018 Q9 A. 1. Sazri should recommend portfolio B over portfolio A 2. The expected utility of portfolio B is (3.5%) higher than the expected utility of portfolio A (3.1%). B 1. Sarzi should recommend allocation 2 2. The amount of liability accounts for 80% of the plan. Allocation 2 has 80% of indexed-linked government bonds, which matches the nature of the liability. C 1. Goal 1 should choose module B YTM = 5.0%, PMT = 0, N = 10, FV = $7.5mn; PV = 4,604,349 2. Goal 2 should choose module C YTM = 6.9%, PMT = 0, N = 25, FV = $15mn; PV = 2,829,102 3. Calculating Weighs Module A: 25.7% [(10,000,000 - 4,604,349 - 2,829,102)/ 10,000,000] Module B: 46.0% (4,604,349/10,000,000) Module C: 28.3% (2,829,102/10,000,000)
已回答請問 reading 13 practice problem Q15 假設在實際上考試中,我應該寫下哪些點可以拿到分數呢? Q1. Compared with an MVO approach, weights of global market portfolio are input in a reverse optimization approach. Compared with an MVO approach, allocation of a reverse optimization approach will be more diversified. Q2. Return on Global Bonds = 2.0% + (0.6) (5.5%) = 5.3% Return on US Equities = 2.0% + (1.4) (5.5%) = 9.7% 如果這樣寫可以嗎?
已回答老师你好,有两个有关ethics的问题 1)在第一张图片中,A基金怎么做才不会违规?他怎么去审核才不违规? 2)有关重大信息:竞争对手的假设才被视为不是重大信息。那这个为什么视为不违规…… 谢谢
老师好,2013年个人IPS第一题(voorts)。题目题干最后一行,说有一个cash reserve。题目正解中没有考虑这个cash reserve,alternate answer里考虑cash reserve了。我想确认,是考虑好还是不考虑好。——老师,我又有一个新的问题,C小问答案里算了cash reserve,那是为什么A小问里的cash flow needs里没有算这部分呢?
已回答精品问答
- Risk Budget and risk parity 第二道思考题,里面的Variance是不是完全是个冗余信息,给来误导的呀?
- 老师,给最新的信息更高权重为什么不是availability bias呢?
- 她对个人笔记本电脑(personal laptop)进行了完整备份(full backup),并确保备份前已删除所有公司文件(all company files removed)。 目的:确保新备份中不包含任何前公司数据,避免合规风险。 遗留问题: 硬盘上的旧备份(previous backups)仍包含公司文件。 她不想因删除旧备份而丢失个人文件的备份历史(backup history for personal files)。 针对上述分析我有个疑惑,这个人不是已经在自己笔记本上备份了drive上的个人信息吗,怎么又Not wanting to lose the backup history for her personal files呢?他不是已经把自己的私人信息备份了吗!?
- 老师第二题 假设激励费的费率都一样 是不是soft会比hard好很多对于GP来说 GP会赚多得多的钱?
- 第二题答案上说的是smaller difference,选项c是wider dispersion 是不是题出错了
- 2022 mock A上午部分,第4题的BC 两问,答案不怎么明白。
- 能否从定义出发解释下CDS price是什么?为什么要这样计算?它在实操中怎么用?
- 这道题约掉百分号我觉得是错误的,因为如果把百分号带入进去,实际结果比题目中的结果大100倍,原版书课后题P106页,我算出来答案是43287,可是结果是4317774,请问我可否说原版书出题不严谨?










