V不能同意受托人要求，与参照过往业绩来雇佣V有什么矛盾点吗？不理解，看不出来为什么违规

P是自变量，move long

defaulted on a bank loan used to pay for education fee as her unexpected high wedding cost.贷款作为教育费用其实是支付高额婚礼费用，第二家小贷公司给她还款名义是父母的生病费用，这不违反诚信原则吗？还可以看作是不违规行为吗?

请问这里怎么判断客户是beneficiary还是这个mandate呢？这里出现trust了，难道不属于第二类的beneficiary吗？

While trading on behalf of a pension account, an analyst receives special research reports from the brokerage firm with whom she is doing the trades. Such an activity is: A a violation of only The Code of Ethics. B not in itself a violation of Standard III(A), Loyalty, Prudence, and Care, nor the Code of Ethics. C a violation of both Standard III(A), Loyalty, Prudence, and Care, and the Code of Ethics.

Emmy, CFA, responsible for proxy voting, is on behalf of her bank's asset management clients. Recently, Emmy performed a cost–benefit analysis that showed the proxy-voting policies might not benefit the bank's clients. Consequently, without informing anyone, Emmy immediately changes the proxy-voting policies and procedures. Except for the major mergers, Emmy now votes client proxies on the side of management on all issues. Emmy least likely violated the CFA Institute Standards of Professional Conduct in regard to: A Cost–benefit analysis. B Proxy-voting policy disclosures. C Voting with management. 老师，我还是不理解这个题

这道题的题目和视频讲解里的题目稍微有些不一样

老师，为什么later the afternoon是正确的？不应该 立刻 发打印版吗？

老师, 您好. 这道题的题干问 "Parker is LEAST likely", 意思是 "Parker最不可能...". 问题的题干和答案C连起来就是 "Parker is least like in violation", 意思就是"Parker最不可能没有违反 (双重从否定为肯定,即Parker违反了?)" 但是答案解析说的是 Parker的做法没有问题. 如果题干问的是 Most Likely, 再选C, 那么意思才是:"最有可能没有违法", 这样才说得通吧?

老师 你好 我这个IRR NPV 视频只有十分钟 然后跳过了前面很多课件 直接从30 张PPT 开始讲 并没有讲IRR NPV 是什么 这些 请问是我电脑的问题吗