用同学2023-05-28 10:30:37
Statement 5: direct private real estate的流动性要低于public real estate,其return不应该要高于public real estate吗?由于流动性溢价
查看试题回答(1)
Johnny2023-05-28 15:15:09
同学你好,关于流动性的问题,这里教材给的说法是极为模糊的:Perhaps REIT investors are able to capture a significant portion of the liquidity risk premium garnered by direct investors (because the REIT is a direct
investor) as well as benefit from professional management.
直接投资地产的流动性很低,这个低流动性会通过liquidity premium来补偿,结果教材说的是REIT的投资者可能也会获得绝大部分的liquidity premium。
Statement 5的一个突破点在于原版书R4的exhibit 7,加杠杆的REIT和直接投资房地产的收益有着显著差异,但如果REITs是unleverged(对杠杆做了调整),那么同一种property type下的收益率差别不大
- 评论(0)
- 追问(0)
评论
0/1000
追答
0/1000
+上传图片

