傅同学2022-07-06 22:30:37
R7课后第18题:为什么是从tax的角度分析,不是从time horizon的角度分析?题干说的unforeseen costs might occur more than a decade inthe future,unexpected needs也应该符合equity investment啊
回答(1)
Johnny2022-07-08 09:26:48
同学你好,除了retirement account,其他三个账户账户都是税后的。原版书中有这么一段话:As a general rule, the portion of a taxable asset owner’s assets that are eligible for lower tax rates and deferred capital gains tax treatment should first be allocated to the investor’s taxable accounts. For example, equities should generally be held in taxable accounts, while taxable bonds and high-turnover trading strategies should generally be located in tax-exempt and tax-deferred accounts to the extent possible. 通常,如果一个资产的税率较低而且资本利得税可以递延,那么把它放入taxable account,例如权益通常放入taxable account,而课税债券和高周转率的交易策略就要放入免税账户或递延税账户。本题就是基于这个“常识”出发,由于要加大股票投资,那么就把他放到课税账户中,于是首先排除retirement account。由于过去了10年,他的两个孩子已经17和20岁,正是大学教育需要花钱的时候,此外Emma本人也存钱用于unforseen cost,于是这两个账户都不容损失,于是不适合增加股票这种风险较高的资产,只有money market account可以用于加投股票。你仅从time horizon是没法直接做账户分配的。
- 评论(0)
- 追问(0)
评论
0/1000
追答
0/1000
+上传图片


