天堂之歌

听歌而来,送我踏青云〜

您现在的坐在位置:首页>智汇问答>CFA三级

岳同学2020-08-31 11:33:14

Asset Allocation 請問實際上考試這樣寫可以嗎? 2017 Q8 A AO 1. The foundation has no liability-like payments, but only minimum spending and an AO approach can minimize the likelihood of decline; ALM 1. There is a fixed amount of EUR 5mn to distribute yearly, which can bee seen as an obligation to pay. B 1. Assets in the same asset class should be homogenous. Private equity and real estate are not the same; 2. Asset classes should be mutually exclusive. Broad EUR fixed income is not different from EUR-denominated government bonds. C 1. Emerging market equities should be added into the current portfolio; 2. Sharpe ratio of new asset class > Sharpe ratio of current portfolio × correlation 0.481 > 0.538 × 0.79 => 0.481 > 0.425 D 1. Because the investment horizon of the foundation is a perpetuity, Monte Carlo is suitable for investment over a multi-period; 2. Monto Carlo can compute a path-dependent terminal value since the foundation is rebalanced every six months.

回答(1)

Johnny2020-09-07 15:16:47

同学你好
A. AO. no liability-like payment这个说法有问题,因为第二个objective是每年至少要花费5million,这是个硬性的金额支出,因此是个liability了。而第一个objective是至少3%支出,你有100元就花费3元,你有10000元就花费300元,没有强制性规定具体数目,所以不是liability-like。这道题是只挑有利于AO的说法,因此就是绕开第二个objective去说第一和第三个objective适用AO,比如第一个objective不是liability-like,第三个objective是unrelated to the liability,因此可以用AO,总之要绕开第二个objective。
ALM. 保险起见,同学你在后面再补一句:While in an AO approach,the liability is ignored。就是一踩一捧,说下为啥不能用AO

B.没啥大问题,基本意思都表达到就差不多了。
C.本题已经在casebook中被删除了,所以可以跳过这道题
D.依旧一踩一捧,就是在两个bullet point后面再说一下为啥MVO不行。第一个bullet point说下MVO是single-period,所以不适用。第二个bullet point再写下MVO ignores the semiannual rebalancing 之类的话。


  • 评论(0
  • 追问(0
评论

精品推荐

评论

0/1000

追答

0/1000

+上传图片

    400-700-9596
    (每日9:00-21:00免长途费 )

    ©2025金程网校保留所有权利

    X

    注册金程网校

    验证码

    同意金程的《用户协议》
    直接登录:

    已有账号登录