郑同学2020-09-21 08:16:49
老师,这是官网题。请教,为什么股权估值,在诉讼相关方面,对非上市公司更重要,相对于上市公司?
回答(1)
Chris Lan2020-09-21 10:34:30
同学你好
原版书的描述如下,从原文中,并没有看出诉讼估值是更重要的这种观点。你能把解析贴出来看一下吗,我们看看解析从哪个角度解释的这个问题。或者你方便把你这份文件共享我一下。我来帮你找找。
Litigation—legal proceedings including those related to damages, lost profits, shareholder disputes, and divorce—often requires valuations. Litigation may affect public or private companies or may be between shareholders with no effect at the corporate level.
As the above descriptions make clear, each of the three major practice areas requires specialized knowledge and skills. This fact has led many valuation professionals to focus their efforts in one of these areas. Transactions, for example, often involve investment bankers. Compliance valuations are best performed by valuation professionals with knowledge of the relevant accounting or tax regulations. Litigation-related valuations require effective presentations in a legal setting.
致正在努力的你,望能解答你的疑惑~
如此次答疑能更好地帮助你理解该知识点,烦请【点赞】。你的反馈是我们进步的动力,祝你顺利通过考试~
- 评论(0)
- 追问(2)
- 追问
-
6题解析在此
- 追答
-
同学你好
这个解析并没有具体说明是为什么,我觉得如果是协会的官网题,我们可以认为这是协会的观点,把这一点当成结论来记吧。
我觉得可能是因为上市公司更加透明一些,涉及法律诉讼都会披露,而非上市公司则不会披露这些内容,所以透明度会差很多,因此投资者对诉讼是存在信息劣势的。


评论
0/1000
追答
0/1000
+上传图片