郭同学2019-04-30 17:28:05
【问题,题干参照附件】Q. Based on the information given, are Blevin and/or Chaudry most likely in violation of the CFA Institute Standards of Professional Conduct regarding their role in Regal’s corporate bond issuance and the subsequent statutory management of Regal Bank? A)Yes, both Blevin and Chaudry are likely to be in violation with regard to Standard V(A)–Diligence and Reasonable Basis. B)Yes, Blevin is likely in violation with regard to Standard IV(C)–Responsibilities of Supervisors. C)No. 我选了B,因为这个人三周前还是原公司的。Blevin headed Regal’s internal audit department and knew nothing of any fraud or client money laundering, despite having recently supervised a major internal audit exercise. 为啥答案选C
回答(1)
Bingo2019-04-30 17:46:00
同学你好,监管者的职责这条细则主要内容是:监管者应当作出合理的努力(reasonable efforts),以确保自己管辖范围内的员工遵守了相关法律、法规、道德规范和职业标准。这里的原则是:只要下属违规,除非能够证明上司已经勤勉尽责,否则上司就违规。
Blevin之前负责内部审计,管不到前雇主的CEO,超出了Blevin的管辖范围。现在是Blevin的老板违规,而不是Blevin的下属违规,而且他对于上司的违规事情毫不知情,所以他并不违反。
- 评论(0)
- 追问(0)


评论
0/1000
追答
0/1000
+上传图片